Tag Archives: Disruptive Innovation

Impossible is Nothing.

Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they’ve been given than to explore the power they have to change it.

Impossible is not a fact, it’s an opinion.
Impossible is not a declaration, it’s a dare.

Impossible is potential.

Impossible is temporary.

Impossible is nothing.

20140124-142723.jpg

Advertisements

Stop Being Such a Wuss and Release a Full New Phone Each Year

iphone-fingerprint-sensor

AKA Stop Being a Pussy and Be Innovative

Rumors say that the new iPhone 5S will have a new super HD camera/screen, a better battery, NFC, and “possible updates include an IGZO screen for Retina+ 128GB storage.” It could sport a 4.3-inch screen and feature a slo-mo camera and faster processor. It may also come in 6-8 colors, similar to the iPod Touch, and will be thinner and lighter than its previous version and fingerprint reader technology. It may also have a price of $199, just like the current iPhone 5, and have possible release dates of August, September, or October.

The iPhone 6 may have a 12-megapixel sensor, up from the 8-megapixel version of the iPhone 5. It could be waterproof with a 4.8-inch Retina+ HD display with a 3D camera and fingerprint reader. In terms of storage, the next-generation smartphone will come with 128GB instead of the current 64GB. Also, the iPhone 6 may have an indoor mapping feature, NFC integrating with Passbook App for storing store cards, tickets and coupons integrating with NFC. It will have a smart bezel and may have a quad-core Apple A7, using ARM Cortex A15-based cores, or update A6. The iPhone 6 also may have iOS 7 and be made out of plastic and cheaper, with a release date of June 2014.

For Apple, no more of this “S” crap to test out new technology.

Make your products groundbreaking, push the limits, and do it each and every year. Give Google some competition to actually work with.

Since Steve Job‘s death, the lack of innovation at Apple has been unacceptable. Sure, he may not be around to “push for things” anymore, but his cultural influence should have left a mark for Apple to do the same things without him. In my opinion Apple is being pussies and is no longer the innovative, “Think Different” company they once were.

Google is close to becoming this type of company, but they need to fully embrace their GoogleX tech and lead with that, instead of minor updates to their existing products.

GoogleXLabs

People resist change. People don’t understand how the future is going to be. They need to be lead, taught, and shown how things will be.
Like a magician, Google (Apple used to do this) needs to show users what’s in store for their future. Get them excited about the change. Get them ready for the innovations ahead. Push yourself to be more groundbreaking and rely less on playing it safe.

google-project-glass-3

Google, you did this pretty well with +Project Glass , but the advertising should have been stronger and more conceptually oriented. There should be commercials showing us the world of tomorrow. There should be commercials showing a world using Glass , Self-Driving Cars, and Embedded Systems to get us pumped up about what’s coming next, and to create a demand for it. This will allow you to dedicate more resources to developing the technology, since it will be a shared vision of the future with users, and not just the one you have in your head.

self-driving-car

Google has quite possibly the most consistent, well-performing products in the world, and this helps them market themselves. But, Google still needs a “Steve Jobs” to be a showman and to get people excited about the future. Google should continue to run it’s bread and butter search operation, and continue to make improvements to the Android phones, but focus their advertising on Future products that will mystify and amaze people.

bits-robot-blog480

The word “Google” should become synonymous with the words “Future Technology / Amazing Culture,” no longer just the word you use to look stuff up with.

This is ultimately Google’s responsibility to present themselves in this manner. The future is almost here, and the ones quicker to accept this and take full advantage will be the future leaders.

Is Google doing everything they can to make this point known to the average user?

Is Project Glass and self-driving cars just something that geeks know about and think will be super awesome, or are there average consumers talking about this shit at the water cooler?

Who Wants to Build a Startup with Me and Get Super Rich While Changing the World?

let's_get_rich_and-73774

Who wants to change the world (and make some serious cash doing it)?

Change-the-World-Logo

I have the concept and the knowledge… I need a small team who want to change the world.

changetheworld

I really want to develop a new Personality Type testing system, more advanced than the standard MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator). There is so much useful information scattered about the internet, it’s just that you have to look in a million different places and put the pieces together yourself.

As an ENTP, I’m super excited about this challenge and am very knowledgeable about the subject. I’ve even studied up on Socionics, which is like twice as complicated as the MBTI.

I want to build the test, and then make a website, perhaps even an app that:

  • Allows you to take a real test, and then has detailed, complete information about your type. I’m also wanting to go as far as inter type relations (how your type interacts with other types).

I need a few people that can help me out. As an ENTP, I’m a natural collaborator and brainstormer. If I try to complete the project by myself, it’ll honestly never happen.

start-ups-1024x565

I think if we could build an app for iOS and Android, we could perhaps even turn this whole thing into a startup company. I met a gentleman yesterday who has a ton of money, and is looking for a creative way to invest it. For example, he’s in the process of buying 85 used houses, remodeling them, and then flipping them for profit. So, he’s got serious cash.

Not only that, but we could include in the app various types of feedback to find out what kind of music they like, what hobbies they are into, where they work. We could use that data to create a quantified self, and I think we could sell that data for big bucks.

This is the future, ladies and gentleman…

the-future-is-now-700x422

But, I absolutely need a few good people to help me with this.

Please let me know if you would be interested in developing this project with me. Anyone who gets involved in the pre-investment stage would be made a part owner of the business. We could actually make some serious cash here, guys.

team-awesome-t-shirt

I have a couple job interviews in the next few weeks, but if this would absolutely be my first choice if we could work it out. We could be the team, the originals, the Mark Zuckerbergs and Shawn Parkers… the Steve Jobs and whoever the hell he worked with. We would be in control and in it from the beginning.

People love this Personality Type stuff, and I know that we can do it much better.

IMG_1453

MBTI breakdown for Men and Women

IGMen IGWomen

Cognitive Information Functions

IMG_1320

MBTI Chart

mbtiNew

Socionics-based Inter Type Relations Chart

IMG_1353

Socionics Chart for the Different Types.

They have different terminologies, for example an ENTP is an ILE in Socionics (It stands for Logical Intuitive Extrovert). Logical being the Thinking functions, Intuitive being the Intuitive Function, and Extrovert for Extrovert. The reason there is only 3 letters vs 4 is because of the order they are placed in. They don’t need a J or a P at the end to identify the type, it goes by what order the letters are in.

Socionics: Types by Quadra

What the Hell are Those Symbols?

Each of those symbols represents a different cognitive function. The triangle is Intuition, the circle is Sensing, the square is Logic (Thinking), and the L-shaped thing is Ethics (Feeling). The Dark ones represent extraverted functions, and the White ones represent introverted functions.

image

Duality in Socionics

One of the strongest variations from MBTI is the belief in “Duals.” These are two different personality types that compliment each others’ strengths and lessen their weaknesses. It is said that “Duals” are IDEAL companions / mates, as they together form an almost Yin-Yang like full entity.

The Dual Functions:

socionics

Cognitive / Information Functions and their Interaction with Each Other.

They compliment / contradict each other, according to socionics. It’s a brilliant philosophy, but it was abandoned by the inventor of the system (who came from Soviet Russia) several years ago. Nobody has taken up the reigns to fully flesh out the system and simplify it for the regular non-sociologist. THAT is the objective of the startup.

Socionics is a branch of psychology that studies relationships between psychological types.

It is based on somewhat modified system of psychological types described by C.G.Jung in his Psychological Types (1916, 1920 etc.) and Tavistock Lectures (1935).

You also know a different version of Jungian typology known as the Myers-Briggs Type Theory (MBTT). It is based on the test called Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). It is well known in the US, and for the last years in Europe as well.

The Myers-Briggs Type Theory is sometimes confused with socionics, although there are some differences between these two theories. Let us describe them shortly:

  1. Different methods of type evaluation. MBTT almost completely relies upon tests, while socionics from the beginning developed alternative methods – determining type by interviewing, observation, etc. Verbal testing is considered as a secondary, not primary method, because it says nothing about the nature of types. This does not mean that tests are not known in socionics. For example we the authors of this article developed the Socionic Multifactor Test, which we are going to discuss below. In the last years socionics focuses on biological parameters of types.
  2. Somewhat different definitions of the 4 basic type criteria. In MBTT, the type is defined as 4 basic choices: extraversion (E) or introversion (I), sensing (S) or intuition (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), judgment (J) or perception (P). Socionics uses terms logic/ethic – instead of thinking/feeling, and rationality/irrationality – instead of perception/judgment. However, more important is the contents of these definitions, they do not always coincide.
  3. Intertype relationships. Although several representatives of MBTT proposed their own views on compatibility between the Myers-Briggs types, a thorough theory of intertype relationships does not exist in MBTT. By contrast, Socionics, from the very beginning, was created as a theory describing and explaining some regularities of relations between people.

On the other hand, there is also a lot in common between these two theories. Main fields of application are the same: family and business consulting, education etc. When first publications about MBTT appeared in the former USSR (a very short overview appeared in 1984, and several popular books were translated since 1994), socionists found a lot of useful information there. We believe in fruitful cooperation between these two branches of Jungian typology is possible; we should not forget about the differences, but we believe they can be resolved.

Here are some links that go into depth more about the way the functions interact with each other (and it goes into much more detail about socionics:

I know it’s a little tricky and complex, but that’s the point. We make it simple and user-friendly and we disrupt society.

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/32-foundations

http://www.socionics.us/relations.shtml

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/10-socionics

http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/content.php/22-socionics-hypothesis

http://www.socionics.us/theory/information.shtml

http://www.socionics.us/practice/duality.shtml

http://www.socionics.us/philosophy/scientific_theory.shtml